Papers with LLM-based translation systems
Reasoning for Translation: Comparative Analysis of Chain-of-Thought and Tree-of-Thought Prompting for LLM Translation (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used for specialized tasks but their application to machine translation has received little attention. |
| Approach: | They evaluate reasoning-based prompting strategies across multiple language pairs and domains and measure their effect on translation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed prompting strategies outperform traditional prompting methods across language pairs and domains and achieve improvements of up to 6.4 BLs. |
Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit translationese errors and generate unexpected unnatural translations . Neural machine translation (NMT) has become the dominant method in machine translation research . |
| Approach: | They evaluate the prevalence of translationese in LLM-generated translations and investigate its roots during supervised fine-tuning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods reduce translationese while improving translation naturalness . the proposed methods are validated by human evaluations and automatic metrics . |
SwiLTra-Bench: The Swiss Legal Translation Benchmark (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Joel Niklaus, Jakob Merane, Luka Nenadic, Sina Ahmadi, Yingqiang Gao, Cyrill A. H. Chevalley, Claude Humbel, Christophe Gösken, Lorenzo Tanzi, Thomas Lüthi, Stefan Palombo, Spencer Poff, Boling Yang, Nan Wu, Matthew Guillod, Robin Mamié, Daniel Brunner, Julio Pereyra, Niko Grupen
| Challenge: | In Switzerland legal translation relies on legal experts who must be both legal experts and skilled translators—creating bottlenecks and impacting effective access to justice. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmarking system that evaluates Swiss legal translation systems based on 180K aligned Swiss legal translator pairs . they show frontier models achieve superior translation performance across all document types while specialized translation systems excel specifically in laws but under-perform in headnotes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms specialized models in laws but underperform in headnotes. |